sovereign individual mastering the transition to the information age

We cheated a little bit and asked the same question to Microsoft’s Bing-which also uses GPT-4. It then provided more details and technical information about each model. ChatGPT couldn’t reply because it was limited to information from before 2021. We asked the two models for the differences between OpenAI’s GPT-4 and Google’s PaLM2. Internet connectivity is also a major plus. Results using Bard's code Results using ChatGPT's code In our test, we asked both chatbots to create a simple HTML file with a button that shows an emoji every time we press it ChatGPT took about 30 seconds, whereas Bard provided an answer almost immediately. ChatGPT is also able to generate snippets of code, but it takes a considerably longer time. Supporting over 20 programming languages, it can help professionals with code generation, explanation, and debugging. When it comes to coding, Bard is a clear winner. Both provided a good result, but Google gave us more context to properly understand their meaning, not just their translation. These were phrases that, if translated literally, would not make any sense.

First, we asked it to translate a couple of phrases from English to Spanish and vice versa. Bard vs ChatGPT: A five-minute comparisonĭecrypt compared both models, and the results were very satisfactory. Google didn’t disclose any more characteristics about these PaLM2-based models. Image: Googleįor context, the most powerful version of the previous PaLM was trained on 540 billion parameters (3X the parameters used for GPT-3.5). Google also developed other more capable and powerful versions: Otter, Bison, and Unicorn. The lightest one, “Gecko,” is primed for smartphone integration which means you’ll be able to run it locally on your own Android device. Google also announced different versions of its model. This new version runs on PaLM 2, which Google says “significantly outperforms PaLM while using significantly less compute at inference time.”

That version of Bard was trained on a large language model called LaMDA. After hallucinating live and falsely claiming that the James Webb Space Telescope took the very first pictures of 'exoplanets,' people quickly pointed out its flaws, Google’s stock sank, and its parent company Alphabet lost $100 billion. Google introduced Bard in February, but it was not too impressive.

Sovereign individual mastering the transition to the information age